Review: Internet Explorer 9

Internet Explorer is considered a bit of a dinosaur: big, slow, and a bit clunky. If that’s the case, then IE9 is more like a velociraptor.

Zara Baxter | Tuesday, May 17 2011 | 18 Comments

Product type: Web browser
Editors rating: Editor's rating: 4

Internet Explorer 9

RRP incl GST: Free
Contact: ie.microsoft.com

AT A GLANCE
  • Fast browser with GPU accelerationImproved tab and download management
  • Privacy features reasonably well
  • thought outDoesn’t overtake Firefox in features
  • Standards compliance still needs work

As an update it’s an immense improvement, but it won’t win over Firefox fans.

Editor's rating: 4

Internet Explorer is considered a bit of a dinosaur: big, slow, and a bit clunky. If that’s the case, then IE9 is more like a velociraptor. Whether this raptor can catch Firefox remains to be seen, however.

IE9 is fantastically streamlined and there’s no denying that Microsoft has learned from the trends visible in the slimline Chrome. The address bar – filled with informational icons – nudges the tabs aligned alongside it, with a menu wheel tucked off to the right. I found the tabs alongside the address bar cluttered and they confused my usual interface navigation, but they can be moved to their usual spot below it.

For old IE hands, the main difference you’ll notice, apart from the inevitable menu reshuffling and slick design, is the speed. As long as you’re on Windows 7 and can upgrade to the new version, you’ll be immensely pleased at how fast it delivers even heavily-architected and animation-laden sites.

If you’re a Firefox user wondering whether it’s worth checking out the latest IE, I have six words for you: download manager and address bar search.

Microsoft has finally implemented a download manager – for many, the reason they left IE behind somewhere after version 4 – and it performs well. You can pause and resume longer downloads, as well as open downloaded files. There’s no option to show the download folder, but that’s a minor niggle. You can also now search using your default search services just by typing search terms into the address bar.

Another nice touch is the new unobtrusive messages – at the base of the window, where they can be a little too easy to miss.

Finally, tabs now behave sensibly, to my mind, in that you can drag them into a new window, or between windows, and there’s a ‘most popular sites’ selection available when you open a new tab. You can also pin a tab to the start menu, though unlike most other browsers’ ‘pinning’, this has the effect of turning a web page into an application, launchable in IE from the start menu.

Under the hood there are improvements as well, such as GPU acceleration and more support for HTML5, though it still doesn’t fare particularly well in the HTML5 standards test – it rated only 130 out of 400. Microsoft says this is because it has taken a conservative approach, only implementing HTML5 standards that are stable.

Microsoft has bundled in several new features that address privacy and security. When you download an application, for example, IE9 uses a reputation estimate to determine whether it might be bad. It’s crude, but it will at least pop up an extra warning. In addition, Microsoft now has a Tracking Protection List support. Essentially, this lets you download lists provided by third party sites that block downloads such as JavaScript or cookies from sites determined by those sites to be unacceptable. The value of this is dependent on whether you agree with the values of the third party, and it’s hard to see it being widely used, not least because IE9’s intro screen doesn’t make much of a song and dance about its existence. Options such as this are becoming more necessary in our world of zombie cookies and the like, however. You can also browse privately, and delete your browsing history easily.

How does it compare? It’s fast, and it delivers much-needed speed benefits and useful features to the many IE users out there – upgrade right now, if you can – but I can’t see it winning over the Firefox faithful. Not that it isn’t an excellent browser, but it really offers nothing significant that Firefox lacks.
18 Comments
it won't win over Firefox fans, it will lose users to Firefox and Chrome I'm afraid, Zara, your review of IE9 is a work of fiction. IE9 has the same issues with ad banners that IE8 had and continuously has errors when loading many pages. This review is thinly veiled marketing blurb from Microsoft - Ctrl+C, Ctrl+V....
Posted by Frank at 11:04:46 on July 15, 2011

Flag abuse

No problems what-so-ever :) Well, I originally planned to use it to download a better browser, but found that its actually not as bad as everyone thinks.

Its a lot faster than Firefox, (on my computer anyway)
Its about as fast as Opera, or Chrome.
Its tons faster that IE8
It looks really nice
Font renders great

Really, no complaints.
Still use chrome though.
Angry Birds and such.

Posted by Anonymous at 18:39:17 on July 12, 2011

Flag abuse

IE9 I hope Microsoft gets the point. I said to myself that if 6 out of 10 comments here are showing a good review Of IE9 i'll download it.Well 15 out of 15 said complete suck. So I will remain in IE8.
Posted by Shawn at 1:02:12 on June 24, 2011

Flag abuse

IE9 very slow I can count slowly from 1 to 3 after a click before it goes into action.
Tabs are too dark, and address bar to small, that I can not see the entire URL.
It is like having a Porsche (in ugly colours), with a Robin Reliant engine, only the Robin Reliant is FASTER!!!
Posted by Beate Hohmann at 4:48:39 on June 17, 2011

Flag abuse

Problems I have to minimize the window and then stretch it out to almost full size in order to have a translucent tab bar; otherwise the tabs are black text on black backgrounds. Crazy. Sites hang up all the time and often I have to refresh one or more times. I see no advantages whatsoever, not faster, not better. All my formatting is screwed up for Huffington Post now, but that may be because AOL merged with HP and THEY screwed things up. But the problems happened when I got that unfortunate pop-up to upgrade Windows. I have Windows Vista.
Posted by Anonymous at 7:01:01 on June 10, 2011

Flag abuse

Vista Acatually IE 9 can run on Vista Sp2 and Windows 7. The artical makes it appear that it only supports Windows 7.
Posted by Anonymous at 7:27:00 on June 2, 2011

Flag abuse

IE9 Looks terrible like going back in time dont like it at all and has been slow to load pages
Posted by Anonymous at 13:53:26 on June 1, 2011

Flag abuse

IE9 umm I installed IE9 on vista, and what a dog. I then installed W7 fresh, and reinstalled IE9. It worked better, but unsure if i like it better than FF or Safari. One big positive for me is that the tool bar depth can be small, with out hiding it, and that stupid google search field is no longer there. I hate anything that forces it presence and can't be removed. IE9 still doesn't have spell checker like Safari has by default, and firefox with an add on, OR adjustable fields. Aesthetically I wasn't sure initially... but liking it the more I see it.
Posted by Brent at 2:03:55 on June 1, 2011

Flag abuse

IE9 update Updated our Toshiba notebook computer that has Windows 7 with the IE9 update and found that I can no longer print from IE! I get the following message when printing:

AN ERROR HAS OCCURED IN THE SCRIPT OF THIS PAGE

LINE: 2107
CHAR: 1
ERROR: UNEXPECTED CALL TO METHOD OR PROPERTY ACCESS
CODE: 0
URL: res://ieframe.dll/preview.JS

We have another notebook that runs on Windows Vista and when we updated to this IE9, we received the same error message. I was able to restore this computer to an earlier restore point so the printer problem was fixed. However, I cannot restore the other computer that has W7 as it won't list an earlier restore point.

Can anyone help?
Posted by alicete at 17:40:06 on May 31, 2011

Flag abuse

IE9 I installed it used it for 5 minutes and then uninstalled it. I have been an IE user since IE4 and always quick to upgrade but not with IE9. The first reason is the missing Search bar, while I understand you can search from the address bar I don't like this Google Chrome approach. Next the Cleartype fonts, this was a feature I always turned off very quickly and with IE7 I even hard coded any site I built not to render Cleartype for any visitor. I hate Cleartype and won't use IE9 because there is no way to turn it off anymore. So I will stick with IE8 and when that becomes obsolete then it is time to move over to Firefox 4.
Posted by Blair at 22:24:15 on May 29, 2011

Flag abuse

CURRENT ISSUE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Tablets tested:
Can anything knock the iPad off it's number one spot? We round up 13 tablets.

Smart storage:
We test five NAS boxes.

Web Browsers:
Latest versions speedtested.

SIGN UP
PC World's weekly round-up of tech news, gear and game reviews, software selections, and handy How Tos.
Blogs
Hot Products

Hot Products || PC World editors iPhone 4S launch pics and unboxing
The iPhone 4S launched at midnight through both Vodafone and Telecom. ... READ MORE

Tux Love

Tux Love || Geoff Palmer Linux Mint: From scratch - Part III
Now you've tried Mint, you'll want to install it properly. If you're ... READ MORE

Tech Guy

Tech Guy || Juha Saarinen Pumping ultrafast packets
Why thirteen is lucky for broadband speed tweaking Net nostalgia: One of ... READ MORE

In a Nutshell

In a Nutshell || Zara Baxter Logging, not login
At an event in Singapore yesterday, Seamus Byrne, the editor of CNet ... READ MORE

Harley O'Gyver

Harley O'Gyver || Harley Ogier Braver than a barrel of codemonkeys
If you've ever wondered, "can a grown man really do that?", Harley O'Gyver ... READ MORE

The Arcade

The Arcade || PC World editors Are HD remakes really necessary?
Remember all those games you loved in the 90s and early 00s? Well, now ... READ MORE

Dumb Terminal Live!

Dumb Terminal Live! || PC World editors New Zealand memes: We think we're real funny
We New Zealanders love the internet, and we have a pretty good sense of ... READ MORE