Review: Intel 520 Series
Chip giant Intel has been at the forefront of solid-state storage for a while now, but its new Cherryville represents a slight departure from past models.
Juha Saarinen | Wednesday, May 23 2012 | 2 Comments
Product type: 240GB 2.5-inch SSD
Editors rating:
RRP incl GST: $839
Contact: intel.com
- Great performance backed by Intel commitment to reliability and security
- Steep price
Premium SATA 6Gbps SSD from Intel based on the Sandforce SF2281 controller.
Chip giant Intel has been at the forefront of solid-state storage for a while now, but its new Cherryville represents a slight departure from past models.
As it lacks its own SATA 3.0-capable controller, Intel used the third-party Sandforce SF2281 controller for the 520 drive. However, Intel has used its own multi-level Flash chips, using its 25nm process. These new chips adhere to the latest ONFI 2.2 standard – which basically means that they handle flash memory better. Intel has also had a hand in writing the controller firmware, and promises improved reliability, rating life expectancy at 1.2 million hours between failures.
The drive is also preconfigured with AES 256-bit encryption for security, suggesting that they are intended for high-end or enterprise use. Intel ships the drive as a kit with management software, mounting brackets and both SATA and power cabling, making it straightforward to install.
In most of our tests, which included PC Mark 7 storage, our 240GB review drive performs comparably to other Sandforce SF2281-based drives such as the OCZ Vertex 3. The Intel drive has substantially better write performance, however. With sequential writes, the 520 scored 240Mbyte/s compared to 175Mbyte/s for the Vertex 3 in AS SSD. Random 4kbyte writes, as measured by CrystalDiskmark3 were 15-20% faster with the 520.
Excellent performance is a big draw card, but unfortunately, Intel charges a premium – our 240GB review model costs around $800, $200-$250 higher than other Sandforce SF2281-based drives. Serious enthusiasts and enterprise users may consider the 520 drive worth the premium however.
- Commentss
- Reviews
Windows vs. iOS vs. Android:How to choose the best tablet for you
101 great websites:
You haven't heard of yet
DIY desktops:
We ask the pros for building tips
Hot Products || PC World editors iPhone 4S launch pics and unboxing
The iPhone 4S launched at midnight through both Vodafone and Telecom. ... READ MORE
Tux Love || Geoff Palmer Google : Starting to be evil?
Google recently deleted AdBlock Plus from its Android Play Store. This is ... READ MORE
Tech Guy || Juha Saarinen Small balls of solder
The idea that desktops might change forever is enough to send geeks into a ... READ MORE
In a Nutshell || Zara Baxter Logging, not login
At an event in Singapore yesterday, Seamus Byrne, the editor of CNet ... READ MORE
Harley O'Gyver || Harley Ogier Pay for internet by-device? Not on my watch.
So as those of you who follow my twitterstream will know, I'm currently in ... READ MORE
The Arcade || PC World editors New Year, new games
You'er going to laugh. Or at the very least, you're going to scoff and ... READ MORE
Dumb Terminal Live! || PC World editors New Zealand memes: We think we're real funny
We New Zealanders love the internet, and we have a pretty good sense of ... READ MORE





Posted by tumohe at 11:26:37 on May 23, 2012
Flag abuse
In other words, run 137 of these drives and on average one of them will fail every year. Run 1,370 of them and one of them will fail every 5 and a bit weeks, etc.
Posted by pablo d at 13:47:50 on May 24, 2012
Flag abuse