Intel 510 SSD
Code-named Elmcrest, Intel’s 510 series drives use 34nm flash memory and come in 120GB and 250GB variants.
Juha Saarinen | Thursday, May 05 2011
Product type: Solid-state drive
Editors rating:
RRP incl GST: TBA
Contact: intel.com
- Excellent sequential read and write performance
- Full mounting and installation kit included
- Average random read and write performance
Intel’s pricey SSD 510 is quick with sequential reads and writes but bogs down with random transfers.
Code-named Elmcrest, Intel’s 510 series drives use 34nm flash memory and come in 120GB and 250GB variants; we tested the latter.
Compared to existing Intel SSDs, Elmcrest hikes performance substantially. Intel rates the 250GB drive at 500MByte/sec sequential reads and 315MByte/sec writes. Those scorching hot figures are more than a 3Gbits/sec SATA interface allows for; in fact it gets close to the 600MByte/sec limit of SATA 3.0.
The 120GB drive is slower, at 450MByte/sec reads and 210MByte/sec writes.
Full marks to Intel for providing a complete SSD kit with the 250GB 510: inside the box you’ll find the 2.5-inch 510 drive, plus a 3.5-inch adapter, screws, power and SATA cables as well as a mini-CD with instructions.
Opening up the drive case reveals not-quite Intel Inside: the 510 SSD uses a Marvell 88SS9174 controller coupled with a Hynix 128MB DDR3-1333 RAM buffer to keep the sixteen 34nm Intel flash chips busy.
I plugged the drive into a 6Gbps port on a Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD3R motherboard and formatted it under Windows 7; this left 232GB usable space.
Performance is a mixed bag. In some tests like CrystalDiskMark, the drive went beyond the promised 500/315Mbyte read/write speeds. The drive excels in sequential reads and writes, but random transfers aren’t nearly as impressive.
For that reason, IOmeter’s Workstation load showed 16,500 IOPS, with 127MByte/sec total performance. Not bad, but drives using SandForce 2 controllers are quicker.
Unfortunately, the SSD 510 is expensive. Expect to pay well over $1,000 for the 250GB 510. Considering that you may need a new motherboard with SATA 3.0 to make the most of it, the drive is targeted at well-heeled enthusiasts who may prefer the slightly faster OCZ Vertex 3 instead.
- Commentss
- Reviews
Tablets tested: Can anything knock the iPad off it's number one spot? We round up 13 tablets.
Smart storage:
We test five NAS boxes.
Web Browsers:
Latest versions speedtested.
Hot Products || PC World editors iPhone 4S launch pics and unboxing
The iPhone 4S launched at midnight through both Vodafone and Telecom. ... READ MORE
Tux Love || Geoff Palmer Linux Mint: From scratch - Part III
Now you've tried Mint, you'll want to install it properly. If you're ... READ MORE
Tech Guy || Juha Saarinen Pumping ultrafast packets
Why thirteen is lucky for broadband speed tweaking Net nostalgia: One of ... READ MORE
In a Nutshell || Zara Baxter Logging, not login
At an event in Singapore yesterday, Seamus Byrne, the editor of CNet ... READ MORE
Harley O'Gyver || Harley Ogier Braver than a barrel of codemonkeys
If you've ever wondered, "can a grown man really do that?", Harley O'Gyver ... READ MORE
The Arcade || PC World editors Are HD remakes really necessary?
Remember all those games you loved in the 90s and early 00s? Well, now ... READ MORE
Dumb Terminal Live! || PC World editors New Zealand memes: We think we're real funny
We New Zealanders love the internet, and we have a pretty good sense of ... READ MORE




