Megaupload case not a slam dunk, judge says
Megaupload may not be going to trial after all on charges of copyright infringement.
Christina DesMarais | Monday, April 23 2012 | 1 CommentMegaupload may not be going to trial after all on charges of copyright infringement.
That's according to the judge in the case, and the development comes after months of drama involving the now shuttered filing-sharing website.
US District Judge Liam O'Grady made the proclamation while hearing arguments about deleting Megaupload member files, which are enormously expensive to maintain.
The judge said a discussion about wiping Megaupload's database could be premature and that a more relevant question was why Megaupload had not been formally served with criminal papers by the United States.
Attorneys on both sides weighed in.
Dotcom's attorney, Ira Rothken, maintained that whereas individuals can be served outside of US jurisdiction, foreign companies cannot, reports TorrentFreak.
"My understanding as to why they haven't done that is because they can't. We don't believe Megaupload can be served in a criminal matter because it is not located within the jurisdiction of the United States," he said, according to the NZ Herald.
Prosecutor Jay Prabhu alluded to Dotcom as an individual who owned 68 percent of the now shuttered company.
This isn't the first time problems with paperwork have thrown a wrench into proceedings against Dotcom. A month ago, New Zealand authorities admitted they made a procedural mistake before seizing Kim Dotcom's computers, documents and a trove of vehicles back in January.
Considering the visibility of the case, the incredible amount of resources that have been involved in arresting Dotcom and taking his possessions, as well as the millions of files kidnapped from users -- many of whom were using Megaupload for legitimate purposes -- you'd think the question about whether or not a trial against Dotcom is possible would have come up sooner.
Dotcom himself is furious that his businesses have been destroyed and says the case is the result of "corruption on the highest political level, serving the interests of the copyright extremists in Hollywood," reports TorrentFreak.
"We have already been served a death sentence without trial and even if we are found 'not guilty,' which we will, the damage can never be repaired," he said.
Windows vs. iOS vs. Android:How to choose the best tablet for you
101 great websites:
You haven't heard of yet
DIY desktops:
We ask the pros for building tips
Hot Products || PC World editors iPhone 4S launch pics and unboxing
The iPhone 4S launched at midnight through both Vodafone and Telecom. ... READ MORE
Tux Love || Geoff Palmer Google : Starting to be evil?
Google recently deleted AdBlock Plus from its Android Play Store. This is ... READ MORE
Tech Guy || Juha Saarinen Small balls of solder
The idea that desktops might change forever is enough to send geeks into a ... READ MORE
In a Nutshell || Zara Baxter Logging, not login
At an event in Singapore yesterday, Seamus Byrne, the editor of CNet ... READ MORE
Harley O'Gyver || Harley Ogier Pay for internet by-device? Not on my watch.
So as those of you who follow my twitterstream will know, I'm currently in ... READ MORE
The Arcade || PC World editors New Year, new games
You'er going to laugh. Or at the very least, you're going to scoff and ... READ MORE
Dumb Terminal Live! || PC World editors New Zealand memes: We think we're real funny
We New Zealanders love the internet, and we have a pretty good sense of ... READ MORE





Posted by Anonymous at 12:28:08 on April 23, 2012
Flag abuse