Facebook Graph Search: little privacy and no opting out

You may not have access to Facebook's Graph Search, but once it rolls out there won't be any escaping it.


Although Facebook's Graph Search isn't available to most users yet, once it rolls out more broadly, there won't be any escaping it.

That's because, as Quartz points out, Facebook removed the capability to opt out of searches last month, before it announced the new feature. Sam Lessin, a Facebook product manager, confirmed the change to The New York Times in December, saying that only "a single-digit percentage of users" had opted out when the choice was available. (Of course, with 1 billion users, that still translates to at least 10 million people.)


Search gets personal
Graph Search is an overhaul of Facebook's existing search box. It lets people type in naturally-phrased queries such as "Restaurants my friends like" and "Photos of people from college," and see personalized results.
Graph Search respects the user's existing privacy settings. So, for example, if only your friends can see your photos, no one else will be able to see those photos in their own searches. In other words, Graph Search isn't showing any information that people otherwise wouldn't be able to see.

Still, the addition of a powerful search tool could bring to the surface information that was once buried. As Gizmodo pointed out, someone could use Graph Search to find a list of single female friends of friends, who live in the same city, and who have similar interests. A user might have second thoughts about sharing those types of details now that they're so easy to aggregate. Also, users may not remember all the things they've "Liked" in the past, and some of those things could be pretty unsavory.
The removal of search opt-out isn't too surprising, given Facebook's history of announcing new features that are enabled by default and are tricky to cover up. A privacy settlement with the Federal Trade Commission now requires the company to get express consent for any changes that "override their privacy preferences," but Graph Search may not run afoul of that settlement. After all, Facebook isn't changing what's public and what's private. It's just making information easier to find for people who already have permission to see it.


How to control what shows
Facebook could ease users' worries with more privacy tools related to search, such as the ability to hide your location, photos, or status updates from certain groups of people. That way, users could still keep their profiles somewhat open on a standalone basis without letting those details be aggregated. But I wouldn't count on Facebook making any big changes.

If you're worried about what Graph Search might uncover, you'll need to revisit their privacy settings to see what's visible. To do so, click the gear icon at the top-right corner of the site and click "Privacy Settings." The "Who can see my stuff?" section will dictate what's visible in searches. You'll also want to visit the "Timeline and Tagging" section on the left sidebar, and review who can see photos and posts that you've been tagged in. (When in doubt, limiting it to "Friends" is the best option.)

Keep in mind that users can still hide their Facebook timelines from other search engines, such as Google. To do so, click the gear icon at the top-right corner of the site, click to "Privacy Settings" and look for "Do you want other search engines to link to your timeline?" in the "Who can look me up?" section.
2 Comments
Correction I meant to say take a peek at the columns on the LEFT hand side of your newsfeed. Apologies. (I might try to know a thing or two about social media and privacy but ask me about left and right and I still manage to confuse the two...)
Posted by Anonymous at 3:22:44 on January 25, 2013

Flag abuse

Privacy Tools and Search Regarding your statement, "Facebook could ease users' worries with more privacy tools related to search, such as the ability to hide your location, photos, or status updates from certain groups of people. That way, users could still keep their profiles somewhat open on a standalone basis without letting those details be aggregated. But I wouldn't count on Facebook making any big changes."

This possibility is already in place. It might take some effort, but the way to go about this is quite simple. Users have the option to create friend lists of the people they are already connected to. In fact, Facebook already has smart lists that do this for you (take a peek at the columns on the right hand side of your newsfeed page). For anything you post, any aspect of your profile, even the pages that you like, you can click a small icon to the side and not only select whether that post is available to the public, friends of friends, friends, and so on but you can selectively choose the lists of people who can see what you are posting among your friends themselves. You can also do the opposite, make a post invisible to select people or groups as well. While you can do this with individual people, arranging your friends into lists makes this much easier.

I'm saying this because I think this is extremely important to know. Though I do have numerous misgivings about facebook, savvy users are able to control their information quite carefully. Most important of all, if you don't want your boss, your mother, or a violent ex lover to see something you've shared, DON'T POST IT ON THE INTERNET. ANYWHERE. PRIVATE OR NOT. Follow that rule and you should be fine. In fact, then you wouldn't even need to worry about lists, would you?


Posted by Anonymous at 3:21:03 on January 25, 2013

Flag abuse

CURRENT ISSUE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Dirty tech
Your gadgets could be harming the environment - and you

NAS vs cloud
Save yourself cash with network storage

Get fit with tech kit
The different ways technology can help you get fit

SIGN UP
PC World's weekly round-up of tech news, gear and game reviews, software selections, and handy How Tos.
Blogs
Hot Products

Hot Products || PC World editors iPhone 4S launch pics and unboxing
The iPhone 4S launched at midnight through both Vodafone and Telecom. ... READ MORE

Tux Love

Tux Love || Geoff Palmer Google : Starting to be evil?
Google recently deleted AdBlock Plus from its Android Play Store. This is ... READ MORE

Tech Guy

Tech Guy || Juha Saarinen Small balls of solder
The idea that desktops might change forever is enough to send geeks into a ... READ MORE

In a Nutshell

In a Nutshell || Zara Baxter Logging, not login
At an event in Singapore yesterday, Seamus Byrne, the editor of CNet ... READ MORE

Harley O'Gyver

Harley O'Gyver || Harley Ogier Pay for internet by-device? Not on my watch.
So as those of you who follow my twitterstream will know, I'm currently in ... READ MORE

The Arcade

The Arcade || PC World editors New Year, new games
You'er going to laugh. Or at the very least, you're going to scoff and ... READ MORE

Dumb Terminal Live!

Dumb Terminal Live! || PC World editors New Zealand memes: We think we're real funny
We New Zealanders love the internet, and we have a pretty good sense of ... READ MORE