How to Filter YouTube's Undesirable Comments
YouTube is great ...until you read the comments. Fortunately, you don't have to see the dregs, thanks to a couple of apps.
Rick Broida | Tuesday, November 29 2011 | 1 CommentRecently one of my kids asked for a TankBot. I'd never heard of it, so I went to YouTube to see one in action. Turns out it's a pretty cool smartphone-controlled tank.
However, when I scrolled down to read the comments for the TankBot demo video, expecting to see some user thoughts or reviews of the product, I discovered a lengthy, profanity-laden flame war between two idiots. I was glad my kids weren't looking over my shoulder -- and moritified to think what would happen if they were surfing YouTube without me.
Because, sadly, the service doesn't filter out objectionable comments. You can flag a comment as spam, but other than that, there's no way to block all the a-bombs, f-bombs, and the like. (And, believe me, YouTube has become a veritable cesspool of inane, obnoxious, hate-filled commentary.)
If you want to protect your children's eyes (as well as your own) from this sort of thing, try Comment Snob for Google Chrome and https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-comment-snob/">YouTube Comment Snob for Firefox. These handy extensions remove undesirable comments from YouTube video pages. (And the Chrome version works with other Web sites as well.) It's not foolproof, but it definitely helps.
Comment Snob blocks comments based on one or more criteria: all capital letters, no capital letters, excessive punctuation and/or capitalization, and so on. It can also kick in when it detects a certain number of spelling mistakes.
Most importantly, it filters comments that contain profanity (though this option is, curiously, disabled by default). And if you're a Chrome user, you can set up filtering for custom words and phrases (great for blocking the more PG and PG-13 comments that the stock profanity filter misses).
I find it a bit ridiculous that Google doesn't offer any kind of comment blocking or filtering, nor even any parental controls. Comment Snob is a good start, but it doesn't go nearly far enough. I want my kids to enjoy YouTube, but I'd rather not expose them to foul-mouthed rants, inappropriate jokes, and outright hate speech. How about a little action, here, Google?
Tablets tested: Can anything knock the iPad off it's number one spot? We round up 13 tablets.
Smart storage:
We test five NAS boxes.
Web Browsers:
Latest versions speedtested.
Hot Products || PC World editors iPhone 4S launch pics and unboxing
The iPhone 4S launched at midnight through both Vodafone and Telecom. ... READ MORE
Tux Love || Geoff Palmer Linux Mint: From scratch - Part III
Now you've tried Mint, you'll want to install it properly. If you're ... READ MORE
Tech Guy || Juha Saarinen Pumping ultrafast packets
Why thirteen is lucky for broadband speed tweaking Net nostalgia: One of ... READ MORE
In a Nutshell || Zara Baxter Logging, not login
At an event in Singapore yesterday, Seamus Byrne, the editor of CNet ... READ MORE
Harley O'Gyver || Harley Ogier Braver than a barrel of codemonkeys
If you've ever wondered, "can a grown man really do that?", Harley O'Gyver ... READ MORE
The Arcade || PC World editors Are HD remakes really necessary?
Remember all those games you loved in the 90s and early 00s? Well, now ... READ MORE
Dumb Terminal Live! || PC World editors New Zealand memes: We think we're real funny
We New Zealanders love the internet, and we have a pretty good sense of ... READ MORE







I agree with using the browser filters, but possibly keeping an eye on your own kids (everybody should) would stop the problem at source. People get paid for having kids, in return they should moderate their monsters a bit. Perhaps you haven't noticed that not all parents do this?
Posted by R2x1 at 16:53:02 on January 13, 2012
Flag abuse