Preview: XCOM: Enemy Unknown

Firaxis is famous for strategy. It's fitting that it's the team to take on XCOM: Enemy Unknown, and bring the strategy game to the console in a way that doesn't slim it down too much, and a way that makes sense.

Siobhan Keogh | Tuesday, August 14 2012 | 12 Comments

Product type: Turn-based strategy game

XCOM: Enemy Unknown

Classification: Not rated
Platform: PC, PS3, Xbox 360
Test Platform: PC

Details

Developer: Firaxis Games; Publisher: 2K Games

A fully fleshed-out strategy game that works on consoles and PC.




Firaxis is famous for strategy. The company is in charge of the juggernaut that is Sid Meier's Civilization, and it's safe to say that the developers there know what they're doing when it comes to turn-based action. It's fitting that they're the team to take on XCOM: Enemy Unknown, and bring the strategy game to the console in a way that doesn't slim it down too much, and a way that makes sense.

In XCOM: Enemy Unknown, you play as a part of a special military operation. Aliens have invaded, and it's your job both to fight the enemies and to conduct research to learn more about this mysterious new species. As you research, you can develop new and better weapons to fight with.

The game is incredibly cheesy - but it seems deliberate. It has none of the seriousness of other strategy games, instead relying on its over-the-top terribleness to create a so-bad-its-good vibe. The aliens are little green men with big round eyes, the voice acting is horrible in a Just Cause 2 kind of way, and the story is even weaker. That's almost impressive.

In each mission, you control four soldiers and navigate a 3D environment. Death is permanent, so losing one of your soldiers means you lose any bonuses they're accrued - a mechanic seemingly adopted from Civ. If one dies in Enemy Unknown, however, they are simply replaced when you undertake your next mission. Each character takes his or her turn, during which they can perform two actions. You might move a character into cover, then peek over cover and take a shot at an enemy. Or you might use both actions for movement to get your character into a better position for attacking.

You can not only move around the ground in this environment, but you can climb up the sides of buildings using ladders or drain pipes. Do that, and you have a better shot of hitting your enemy when you attack.



The tutorial mode is a little dull - it doesn't let you figure anything out for yourself at all, and instead tells you exactly where to go and what to do. We realise that a tutorial is designed to teach you about the game, but it would've been nice to have just a little more freedom to help get us into the game. Once you get past the tutorial, though, the game is actually quite in-depth, and not as easy as it looks. When you attack, you have to weigh up your chances of hitting versus the risk of moving in closer to your enemy, and it's easy to make a mistake.

Some of the most interesting gameplay, however, comes when you're not in missions at all. That's when you get to choose your research to unlock new skills and weapons, and even more interesting, choose which missions to take on. See, you're a part of a coalition of countries. More than one country could be attacked at once, and you have to choose which country to help. You'll improve your standing with the country you help, but also degrade your standing with the one you don't, so you have to struggle to keep everyone happy. If you don't, the country will drop out of the coalition, and take its money and resources with it.

We understand that making a strategy game that works on consoles must be hard - there's often a lot going on - but it would have been nice if Firaxis had made a little more effort with the graphics. Frankly, they look about ten years old. Of course, this is just preview code, but it's pretty rare for graphics to be improved at this point in development, aside from the odd glitch.

XCOM: Enemy Unknown looks interesting, but not astoundingly so, and it might be a hard sell if it's a full price game. For strategy enthusiasts who lament the lack of games for consoles, however, it could be worth a shot. PC gamers are probably going to want to stick to the many tried-and-true already available to them.

12 Comments
horrible reviewer Tis rvew sonds lk it cam frm my 16 yo.

The one ithat complains about a game until I ask, did you read/listen to everything?
No..
That's why you don't understand.
Posted by don at 4:12:05 on September 15, 2012

Flag abuse

a fast pace tactical game under xcom brand The new xcom enemy unknown simply took the brand and theme of previous and build a game focusing on fast pace tactical grid shooter with cool actions for the demands of new generations games and sales.
there were many fans for this brand thats why they use its brand to market their new game.

the previous xcom games from 80s was created with passion focusing replayability, randomness, very strong concept and lots of strategic details.
The new one simple dumb the mechanics for a fast pace game as gamers these days don't have time for a "long" game. added current gen graphics on demand to suit how games should be in this era. to cater to consoles and mass productions for sales.

Its a different game afterall with the xcom skins and theme.
Its not a game created to replace the previous one. Just see it as a New game will using the brand name.
Posted by Anonymous at 2:55:35 on September 15, 2012

Flag abuse

Should've asked for more review time... Seriously, if you only had 40 minutes to play the game, and 20 mins was in the tutorial, you should've considered asking for an extension.

To me, it sounds like you read the synopsis of the game and expanded it with a few of your own words, because you obviously didn't get in to the total nitty-gritty of the game. For instance, it is not trivial to lose one of the team on a mission (to be replaced with another on the next)... when playing the original XCOM, losing a team member was akin to losing a family member! They need to be nurtured and looked after, to get them to their best skill level in order for you to really succeed. Especially in this remake, as you only get 4 team members on a mission (each with specialised skills).

So, back to my initial statement.... if you had played this game for at the minimum a weekend, your review would have been completely different.

As for the graphics, everyone one of the screenies I have seen makes me want to play the game more - so what if they aren't photo-realistic... it's the atmosphere they create and the gameplay involved that makes the game. Just play the original XCOM to get an idea of an awesome game that doesn't rely on snappy graphics to hide a poor game concept....

'nuf said.
Posted by Paul at 16:29:22 on August 24, 2012

Flag abuse

Terrible preview I don't mean to sound like an old fart (really), but can PCWorld please get someone OLDER to write an article on this game? The original XCOM Enemy Unknown is like the original Tetris or Donkey Kong - it's a total legend, beyond any rating and comparison. Firaxis is finally, after all these years, making an effort to create a full-blooded remake, and you're shitting on all the things which make XCOM what it is.

To pull a phrase from Penny Arcade, if someone tells you XCOM is bad they're either ignorant or an idiot. So which is it? Do you not know what you're talking about, or are you retarded?
Posted by Alex at 18:02:08 on August 16, 2012

Flag abuse

Terrible preview Nothing is 'beyond any rating and comparison'. I loved the original XCOM, and would rate it very highly. However, there's nothing to be gained by shrink-wrapping games and putting them on pedestals to worship.

Part of XCOM's charm was the [deliberately] comically-bad writing. Keogh notes that writing, and points out that yes, it seems deliberate. That doesn't mean it's not worth noting.

Another part of its charm was the use of very stereotypical, 1980s/90s Sci-Fi 'Roswell Gray' aliens and similar ultra-cliches. And yes, the terrible graphics were charming, but those weren't quite so deliberate: they were just a product of their time.

The graphics of the remake do look disappointing: I'd been hoping to see the brilliant aspects of XCOM wrapped up in something a little more current-gen. There's a difference between "retro-charming" and "dated". Look at the retro-game sequences in Saints Row: The Third, or Shadows of the Damned. Those are charming, but slick. XCOM just looks like it was rendered on a ten-year-old engine updated with duct-tape and prayers to Cthulhu.

You're welcome to judge the new game however you like -- I've loved plenty of games that were critically panned, and hated plenty of games that were critically acclaimed. Personally, until I get my hands on the finished product, I'm going to trust the opinion of my extremely experienced colleague, whose own experience makes my gaming obsession look like a weekend hobby.
Posted by Harley Ogier, PCW at 11:20:27 on August 17, 2012

Flag abuse

Terrible preview by all means, trust your "extremely experienced colleague" and his (minority) opinion on the games oh so outdated graphics. Me, I'll trust my own eyes AND every other review that either praises the graphic, or doesn't mention them.

and while you're busy trusting your "extremely experienced colleague" about those graphics that were "rendered on a ten-year-old engine updated with duct-tape and prayers to Cthulhu" (that's not near as clever as you think BTW), ask him about all the errors in his extremely experienced article.

I've read every article, preview, and video that I can lay my eyes on, and this one article is the ONLY negative article, and the ONLY one whining about the graphics of all things. In my experience, the "uninformed" game reviewer usually relies on complaints like "poor graphics" as a crutch and as a way to hide their lack of...well....experience.

I hear a new Call of Duty is coming out. I'm sure you guys will love the graphics.
Posted by Anonymous at 18:55:33 on August 17, 2012

Flag abuse

You should work at McDonalds. This is a horrible review.. Just disgustingly bad. Glaring mistakes. You're ripping on the setting and saying that permanent death comes from a completely different game. Are you even aware that this is a re-imagining of UFO: Enemy Unknown? (Or X-COM: UFO defense in America.)

If you're going to write game reviews then for the love of god please spend some time playing games as opposed to playing with yourself.
Posted by Anonymous at 12:00:31 on August 15, 2012

Flag abuse

Lol What an horrible preview...
Posted by Anonymous at 10:27:59 on August 15, 2012

Flag abuse

Comments so far I'll talk about strategic depth when I've had more than an hour with the game, promise. It's pretty difficult when half of your preview time is the tutorial mode. I play strategy games relatively frequently and I'm aware you need a long time to really get in-depth with them.

When I say the tutorial showed me how to do things, I mean it told me EXACTLY where to place my characters at all times, and went on doing that for 20 minutes. Put this guy here. Now put this guy here. Now this guy here. Okay, and this guy here. It could have been cut down significantly by auto-moving my other three characters after teaching me how to move the first one, to make it faster. I just found it a little restrictive, but that's me.

I did research the franchise, but seeing as I haven't played it before I chose to not talk about previous games. I wanted to be honest about my experience.
Posted by Siobhan Keogh, PCW at 9:16:31 on August 15, 2012

Flag abuse

could a strategy gamer review this please? I don't expect everyone who reviews this game to have played the original, even if it is routinely listed as one of the best computer games ever made, but could we at least get a reviewer who can talk about strategic depth? This reads like it was written by an intern who has never played anything but FPS.
Posted by Anonymous at 5:21:16 on August 15, 2012

Flag abuse

CURRENT ISSUE
Newsletter & Subscriptions Windows vs. iOS vs. Android:
How to choose the best tablet for you

101 great websites:
You haven't heard of yet

DIY desktops:
We ask the pros for building tips

SIGN UP
PC World's weekly round-up of tech news, gear and game reviews, software selections, and handy How Tos.
Blogs
Hot Products

Hot Products || PC World editors iPhone 4S launch pics and unboxing
The iPhone 4S launched at midnight through both Vodafone and Telecom. ... READ MORE

Tux Love

Tux Love || Geoff Palmer Google : Starting to be evil?
Google recently deleted AdBlock Plus from its Android Play Store. This is ... READ MORE

Tech Guy

Tech Guy || Juha Saarinen Small balls of solder
The idea that desktops might change forever is enough to send geeks into a ... READ MORE

In a Nutshell

In a Nutshell || Zara Baxter Logging, not login
At an event in Singapore yesterday, Seamus Byrne, the editor of CNet ... READ MORE

Harley O'Gyver

Harley O'Gyver || Harley Ogier Pay for internet by-device? Not on my watch.
So as those of you who follow my twitterstream will know, I'm currently in ... READ MORE

The Arcade

The Arcade || PC World editors New Year, new games
You'er going to laugh. Or at the very least, you're going to scoff and ... READ MORE

Dumb Terminal Live!

Dumb Terminal Live! || PC World editors New Zealand memes: We think we're real funny
We New Zealanders love the internet, and we have a pretty good sense of ... READ MORE